Here’s a rule of thumb that applied to both people and design experiences:
The more attractive something (or someone) is, the more we’re willing to tolerate its flaws.
When something is beautiful, we’ll work with it just a bit more, despite its inadequacies. We do this because we want to be associated with beautiful things. We want to build relationships with beautiful things (same for beautiful people). We want to evangelize them. We want to become a part of them.
When one becomes obsessed with a beautiful object, it isn’t because we want that object to come into our own personal world. It’s in fact the reverse. We want to enter its world. Of course, that thing that we found to be so beautiful at first glance may actually have some awful flaws. Really expensive yet excruciatingly uncomfortable shoes come to mind. We want it to work out so badly.
Here is my theory in a beautifully elegant visual form (also known as “data visualization.”):
So what’s the moral of this blog post? When you’re building stuff, make it usable but also make it attractive. I mean, we should all be aiming for both, but not everything can be Brad Pitt.
There's this beautiful from Don Norman, “Emotion & Design: Attractive things work better”, where he states:
...when we feel good, we overlook design faults. Use a pleasing design, one that looks good and feels, well, sexy, and the behavior seems to go along more smoothly, more easily, and better. Attractive things work better.
I couldn't agree more : )
Posted by: Ale Muñoz at June 26, 2009 2:59 AMNow, if I posted the link to the article, that would be *great* : )
http://jnd.org/dn.mss/emotion_design_attractive_things_work_better.html
Posted by: Ale Muñoz at June 26, 2009 3:00 AMTotally agreed, great thought. And an even better data visualization, simple and effective!
Posted by: Tim at July 2, 2009 10:29 AMThat is a very informative post! I never though about it in that way before... In fact it is actually quite sad because beautifull people have a better chance to achieve success in life just because they are beautifull. In my opinion not fair!
Posted by: Taekwondo Expert at July 13, 2009 3:37 PMAndy Hunt makes the same statement in his book "Pragmatic Thinking & Learning, Refactor Your Wetware". His catch phrase is:
"Strive for good design. It really works better."
I like how you've put it too, especially the "threshold for pain".
Posted by: S2s at September 17, 2009 12:57 PM
I agree, good thoughts. One thing though: "attractive" != "beautiful". "Attractive" is more about appearance, while "beautiful" can be at many different layers.
Posted by: Avi Flax at June 25, 2009 12:22 PM